Leica Camera Concealing quality issues before sales Leica Concealing quality issues before sales My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence : https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors why Leica Camera Delete the Promise? Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients? Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and how you cheating the clients now. Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following: The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer: 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have problems within three years. 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than 90% of the machines have problems? 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and cheating? 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality. Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order to make a profit? www.leica.gmbh fraud@leica.gmbh
Home · Email archive · thread 181a5d6e29e94b7c
Leica Cheating Clients again in 2022, let's look at Leica's M bad quality
Thread ID 181a5d6e29e94b7c · messages 9 · 2022-06-27T15:45:23Z → 2022-07-24T17:12:37Z
Attachments named in the archive: image.png; ANGjdJ841rym40E4BFVr_7KkPS1itjoHF28v3i_n6UkH4XszGC4pYMJ8mOVfOUCND9rji10OcvSb3bUDKNjtpq9l7a1n8W58NxL9WJN0Y4774W72IMN01r0Fyx-KEpL-YsA3EYYbg59lHV0aSFT3_7mbkA7Gt1mz7FnELc6vRcdfomKjPcQbJG9A37EftKa-wGyOULiCZnwyB5sYIEzM3bZYp9fEyhv5NTTEF0wKONwR7lS1QhwCnqaBeisx_5l8wocWrAsSq4cqCu79A7O6pJAf5dbkmFZYPr4RzlPj78ulS3WVXrmOihdM9n8XFuE
Dear Masney Kirstin, I dont know what will you think looking at the following Leica M9 photos, I do feel shame on Leica, and I will keep sharing the photos in Youtube, facebook and other media, PERM in www.leica.gmbh, if you feel the Leica Camera is good quality. [image: image.png] On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote: > [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh> > Leica Concealing quality issues before sales > > My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence : > > https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors > > why Leica Camera Delete the Promise? > Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients? > > Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and > how you cheating the clients now. > > Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's > the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following: > > The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer: > > > 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have > problems within three years. > > 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not > know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than > 90% of the machines have problems? > > 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be > charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and > cheating? > > 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality. > Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order > to make a profit? > > > > www.leica.gmbh <#m_-1011308933201524936_> > fraud@leica.gmbh >
Attachments named in the archive: 71860DA6@8962F65B.9012BF62.jpg; 51B806D2@90555723.9012BF62.png.jpg; ANGjdJ8ljJeuxxiho33lIeanbEroe-p8dXbh2YpUxfI9rbFXUTP30OFDOfHJlg0T8A58xYxeQoVVDRLikClnHTBGmGrXexup-Fvdivu_3fnlTKcpfix0YZaqjxEt4_vY-n_CgzVGKYH0wTrLTqoJZSCjrcdv0yRQi-xUvcl_SkeiogvdE9_DNn9HE8gOFmKypXx7LPD-MrKORVblZyEXWVIInMZ3rgyhX6n_BvffjTvKCt54cW2hlyhO6u0NFoNrcYkI_upIDoE5nkNCNzBuia1qonKaruR_hw_TPPm5GsuZgSBQbhSoLlnMd04URc6RzX2Wny3Ma-QLuBEbirUISkhWArLM89jrcWG0b3192eUE48RbnsJ9ZcjIPHpvPWuNCib8_l2HG5O4hngX65EF; ANGjdJ-Z5IkmICxW5LZikbKs-K
Dear T.C and Masney Kirstin here's another Leica's Cheating evidence, hope you can update on your facebook, youtube and www.leica.gmbh, let everyone know HOW LEICA CHEAT! ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "[Name]" <teeseewoo@gmail.com>; 发送时间: 2022年6月28日(星期二) 凌晨0:13 收件人: "[Name]"<22327861@qq.com>;"fraud"<fraud@leica.gmbh>;"Masney, Kirstin"<Kirstin.Masney@leica-camera.com>;"sandra.looke"<sandra.looke@leica-camera.com>;"sandra.sczesny"<sandra.sczesny@leica-camera.com>;"julia.hartner"<julia.hartner@leica-camera.com>; 主题: Re: Leica Cheating Clients again in 2022, let's look at Leica's M bad quality Dear Masney Kirstin, I dont know what will you think looking at the following Leica M9 photos, I do feel shame on Leica, and I will keep sharing the photos in Youtube, facebook and other media, PERM in www.leica.gmbh, if you feel the Leica Camera is good quality. On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote: Leica Concealing quality issues before sales My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence : https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors why Leica Camera Delete the Promise? Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients? Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and how you cheating the clients now. Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following: The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer: 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have problems within three years. 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than 90% of the machines have problems? 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and cheating? 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality. Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order to make a profit? www.leica.gmbh fraud@leica.gmbh
Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and answer the questions. tc@leica.gmbh On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote: > [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh> > Leica Concealing quality issues before sales > > My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence : > > https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors > > why Leica Camera Delete the Promise? > Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients? > > Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and > how you cheating the clients now. > > Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's > the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following: > > The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer: > > > 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have > problems within three years. > > 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not > know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than > 90% of the machines have problems? > > 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be > charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and > cheating? > > 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality. > Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order > to make a profit? > > > > www.leica.gmbh <#m_-3194037728260264468_m_2086946676543469196_> > fraud@leica.gmbh >
Fehler bei der Nachrichtenzustellung an folgende Empfänger oder Gruppen:
Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com<mailto:Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com<mailto:Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com<mailto:Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Marita.Paasch (Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com)<mailto:Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com<mailto:Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Support@leica-camera.com<mailto:Support@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
dennis.steuer (dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com)<mailto:dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Diagnoseinformationen für Administratoren:
Generierender Server: ldesex02.lcg.leica-camera.com
Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Support@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Ursprüngliche Nachrichtenköpfe:
Received: from ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) by
ldesex02.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.28; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:19:22 +0200
Received: from ldesmailproxy.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.53) by
ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.28 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:19:22 +0200
Received: from mailgateway.leica-camera.com (mailgateway.leica-camera.com [172.29.16.59])
by ldesmailproxy.lcg.leica-camera.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5EF020613;
Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:19:22 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mailgateway.leica-camera.com;
spf=pass (leica-camera.com: domain of teeseewoo@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=teeseewoo@gmail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com;
dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
Received: from mail-yw1-f173.google.com (mail-yw1-f173.google.com [209.85.128.173])
by mailgateway.leica-camera.com with ESMTP id 261GJ9e8015683-261GJ9eA015683
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher�DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits%6 verify�FAIL);
Fri, 1 Jul 2022 18:19:10 +0200
Received: by mail-yw1-f173.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-317710edb9dso29064467b3.0;
Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s 210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=ZYTp034bfH7f9O2ZgewCdbEr5tezsE+050i9PTSlJYU=;
b=JDoTcfFnvTN8TweO7Zjp+JcwK8TJ4e3pYFFLMI06R+Kk5WBuA29TRpQZO/T+9tGRak
3758CRZFztAq7lJa8ZtPmHTPYU6BqzNTlAvj4YWgMCwnsIMJmMmZxUcMWlwSCqar4kL1
Xo1D3uhPm8QOD9jBAoPcBAC1+dnysxVh4XtiGOwHQhO6UeZkbnSvanw4rSmSp2UgcGDd
efsVEG8lJ8XLgl0UGyUGQktyQXCN9QnhYdTHf7s2IfoYDs63fyY9gBEfbvXPUZjVMpaX
GYyEP+VnxcNr4P2ob9De0zXA5AOy8fH5Ud5HcizZeyIMqEMfEvRGwfGFRa52bepwLzlD
dPDg=X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d 100.net; s 210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=ZYTp034bfH7f9O2ZgewCdbEr5tezsE+050i9PTSlJYU=;
b=Q4eiOxA9Wi8pxzyKGuuaGqva9rHLAlOgu64ILFLBcdLtLApppfH/r+QA0N73MhIjYt
oSl7IOXu6btDo2Ykw9IcuB4bGRJ2cmJ3gjbdjCAcK9A9MmYJpyVx/SSOUADELXZd7j7x
TXWJH3fSj2qZA+GPIM/G9GBI+Jy5qQjxP+GP7A5yiuUJXFAflMfmFkk/hcQSchfyNJ5M
tVryinpIAM99TS3SLp42LZGo1N/kc9Aez1GcEwh+aBhvA/uWyZHZGItygRa7+ha51JIL
rGGnA6KrlryjjYXIxdduolwTV8t2tf2lx65ojuAPPoQDMHN+4UmoJ1HQlwTkQ9z1DxLi
fl5Q=X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9TJubeDtNy22VPSkhQJbGF7pB1vWcEcBN2/LuOnz6uHPWciGuv
jVIcy37I8g1mwDSRR6om1dKKpadda96AHbhFHQMX-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uzqKnmGBostX02VSH9A0BJoSmzATTLQhhjRkL1PcvfjTA/R8rRJ6s8wQTUq7F6KmI0wfeNyrnXSewBaXWdakAX-Received: by 2002:a81:60d6:0:b0:31b:8d6c:165e with SMTP id
u205-20020a8160d6000000b0031b8d6c165emr17018686ywb.405.1656692348842; Fri, 01
Jul 2022 09:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <tencent_A0C31C0F84738EE65EDF4CB7A6532D2DBE06@qq.com>
In-Reply-To: <tencent_A0C31C0F84738EE65EDF4CB7A6532D2DBE06@qq.com>
From: [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 00:18:56 +0800
Message-ID: <CAK3OhgAfd9-XrRarvSif9aGyQucadKUyLHhH0i=4kf+Fz+P7zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Leica Cheating Clients again in 2022, let's look at Leica's M bad quality
To: =?UTF-8?B?6ZmG5Y2a5paH?= <22327861@qq.com>, "Coletta, Nadine"
<Nadine.Coletta@leica-camera.com>, "Brand-Gerheim, Ursula"
<Ursula.Brand-Gerheim@leica-camera.com>, <Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com>,
Marita.Paasch <Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com>,
<Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com>, <Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com>,
<Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com>, dennis.steuer
<dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com>, <Support@leica-camera.com>, sandra.looke
<sandra.looke@leica-camera.com>, Elke Macha <Customer.Care@leica-camera.com>,
"Brand, Ursula" <Ursula.Brand@leica-camera.com>, "Kupfer, Sven"
<Sven.Kupfer@leica-camera.com>, "Masney, Kirstin"
<Kirstin.Masney@leica-camera.com>, spareparts <spareparts@leica-camera.com>,
technicalinfo <technicalinfo@leicacamerausa.com>, info
<info@leicasportoptics.com>, <leica@nikecomm.com>, repair
<repair@leicacamerausa.com>, <info@leicastoredc.com>,
<andreas.schweiger@leitz-auction.com>, <info@leicagalleryboston.com>,
<info@lfi-online.de>, <holtorf@lfi-online.de>, <ribeiro@lfi-online.de>,
<lfi@aboteam.de>, <oskar-barnack-award@leica-camera.com>,
<support@picter.com>, <sinar@macconsult.de>, customercare.cn
<customercare.cn@leica-camera.com>, customercare.hk
<customercare.hk@leica-camera.com>, <customercare.tw@leica-camera.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f475d205e2c0bea2"
X-FEAS-DKIM: Valid
X-FE-Policy-ID: 0:1:1:leica-camera.com
Return-Path: teeseewoo@gmail.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
X-Display-Name: Marita.Paasch
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Support@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Support@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
X-Display-Name: dennis.steuer
Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney
We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and answer
the questions.
tc@leica.gmbh
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote:
> [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh>
> Leica Concealing quality issues before sales
>
> My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence :
>
> https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors
>
> why Leica Camera Delete the Promise?
> Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients?
>
> Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and
> how you cheating the clients now.
>
> Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's
> the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following:
>
> The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer:
>
>
> 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have
> problems within three years.
>
> 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not
> know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than
> 90% of the machines have problems?
>
> 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be
> charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and
> cheating?
>
> 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality.
> Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order
> to make a profit?
>
>
>
> www.leica.gmbh <#m_-3194037728260264468_m_2086946676543469196_>
> fraud@leica.gmbh
>
Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and answer the questions. tc@leica.gmbh On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 12:18 AM [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney > > We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and > answer the questions. > > tc@leica.gmbh > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote: > >> [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh> >> Leica Concealing quality issues before sales >> >> My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence : >> >> https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors >> >> why Leica Camera Delete the Promise? >> Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients? >> >> Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and >> how you cheating the clients now. >> >> Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's >> the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following: >> >> The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer: >> >> >> 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have >> problems within three years. >> >> 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not >> know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than >> 90% of the machines have problems? >> >> 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be >> charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and >> cheating? >> >> 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality. >> Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order >> to make a profit? >> >> >> >> www.leica.gmbh >> <#m_2318941503277705028_m_-3194037728260264468_m_2086946676543469196_> >> fraud@leica.gmbh >> >
Fehler bei der Nachrichtenzustellung an folgende Empfänger oder Gruppen:
Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com<mailto:Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com<mailto:Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com<mailto:Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Marita.Paasch (Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com)<mailto:Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com<mailto:Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Support@leica-camera.com<mailto:Support@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
dennis.steuer (dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com)<mailto:dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Diagnoseinformationen für Administratoren:
Generierender Server: ldesex02.lcg.leica-camera.com
Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Support@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Ursprüngliche Nachrichtenköpfe:
Received: from ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) by
ldesex02.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.28; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:40:03 +0200
Received: from ldesmailproxy.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.53) by
ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.28 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:40:03 +0200
Received: from mailgateway.leica-camera.com (mailgateway.leica-camera.com [172.29.16.59])
by ldesmailproxy.lcg.leica-camera.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3492014F;
Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mailgateway.leica-camera.com;
spf=pass (leica-camera.com: domain of teeseewoo@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=teeseewoo@gmail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com;
dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
Received: from mail-yw1-f182.google.com (mail-yw1-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182])
by mailgateway.leica-camera.com with ESMTP id 26DJdfek010727-26DJdfem010727
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher�DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits%6 verify�FAIL);
Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:39:42 +0200
Received: by mail-yw1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31c9b70c382so123763047b3.6;
Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s 210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=iRmNzanMUfpuW6fcGC9Mp7UYf84/6XiQXxO+haW9klE=;
b=CTuKIaGhqoMT9tn0XkwexsxS9abZzgfDvGol2W6BQqDnkhFUj05I2uPIwXqD4sw+Ds
wJxhj4BIVnukq/ee4QWV529c3vLroMmMZmm+XyYu1mXdPkxipXskhnvBUfBh3GQMZK54
9Z3S+W87odrBlwA9IvtA/Obz1QGauaFiYTP8hhTukB3CGaYwoiG51Bfl3vHC/SiONZZU
oV3JQDDw4ZAc5LNq7S/F7H/x373SbOTrOtIy4AcjsKkkvNapJglCpvd8JQT8BUE55B0h
wJZJ+W4YbmjgtHaOLTCYBN4tJjHnjVwWi3FPH0CX8GfguUBxIR/ct6vOX/CJlSp1AHqH
6LKw=X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d 100.net; s 210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=iRmNzanMUfpuW6fcGC9Mp7UYf84/6XiQXxO+haW9klE=;
b=KXqgD//C8aEZMb6BA6YPaqGMu96hJajqgsg0wDIM/M4izmRgAMY6AKAlIUt3yff0Hb
R3Jt8VDmtkpZoGIV3lTCMYjCcQ8y4LS6STEPJUSEfy3Ej5C1qptIyPnC/GdJUkO7hjY4
Zsdi4/BZSIwwaxzmz1DHYpPm/oi5Ca83CRAhlcqt1sQYFJvdr7TEGv8EkMaNoqN25Nae
vHaUhAPIzWQ4zxeQcvcv7z4UHiPxbwEEsjrREFDR8oNz0F4OQT48g52MgUE85ggnsiVm
3iNliXo/gR3i4Rjt3qdQlDLNSaviRV9ggQfjzdAt/avHd9ItCzOa9IeKa/ilYjH4OjQc
OfUA=X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/QCRstovuuH6TkuerM2sDQAGInAPSvAKc1KRKG/WeSg9T+4SZb
qNEvIP9CNIu0reib8Kq6DkTsDRIcHaST8Hw6YSgX-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tKd9gE7vMle+sGA4cGjZ0YvdOGJNe7r7SxFIYsFub410W8Nsg7osyncWPOkQfmxXruTfd22vHFO/LD6QnKomYX-Received: by 2002:a0d:eb83:0:b0:31c:8741:a033 with SMTP id
u125-20020a0deb83000000b0031c8741a033mr6210632ywe.455.1657741180885; Wed, 13
Jul 2022 12:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <tencent_A0C31C0F84738EE65EDF4CB7A6532D2DBE06@qq.com> <CAK3OhgAfd9-XrRarvSif9aGyQucadKUyLHhH0i=4kf+Fz+P7zw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OhgAfd9-XrRarvSif9aGyQucadKUyLHhH0i=4kf+Fz+P7zw@mail.gmail.com>
From: [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:39:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAK3OhgDjn08nox1LKDsS62qQW9Z+h+wHX_ShxHBgm95gDZ87dg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Leica Cheating Clients again in 2022, let's look at Leica's M bad quality
To: =?UTF-8?B?6ZmG5Y2a5paH?= <22327861@qq.com>, "Coletta, Nadine"
<Nadine.Coletta@leica-camera.com>, "Brand-Gerheim, Ursula"
<Ursula.Brand-Gerheim@leica-camera.com>, <Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com>,
Marita.Paasch <Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com>,
<Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com>, <Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com>,
<Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com>, dennis.steuer
<dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com>, <Support@leica-camera.com>, sandra.looke
<sandra.looke@leica-camera.com>, Elke Macha <Customer.Care@leica-camera.com>,
"Brand, Ursula" <Ursula.Brand@leica-camera.com>, "Kupfer, Sven"
<Sven.Kupfer@leica-camera.com>, "Masney, Kirstin"
<Kirstin.Masney@leica-camera.com>, spareparts <spareparts@leica-camera.com>,
technicalinfo <technicalinfo@leicacamerausa.com>, info
<info@leicasportoptics.com>, <leica@nikecomm.com>, repair
<repair@leicacamerausa.com>, <info@leicastoredc.com>,
<andreas.schweiger@leitz-auction.com>, <info@leicagalleryboston.com>,
<info@lfi-online.de>, <holtorf@lfi-online.de>, <ribeiro@lfi-online.de>,
<lfi@aboteam.de>, <oskar-barnack-award@leica-camera.com>,
<support@picter.com>, <sinar@macconsult.de>, customercare.cn
<customercare.cn@leica-camera.com>, customercare.hk
<customercare.hk@leica-camera.com>, <customercare.tw@leica-camera.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000375d3605e3b4f27f"
X-FEAS-DKIM: Valid
X-FE-Policy-ID: 0:1:1:leica-camera.com
Return-Path: teeseewoo@gmail.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
X-Display-Name: Marita.Paasch
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Support@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Support@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
X-Display-Name: dennis.steuer
Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney
We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and answer
the questions.
tc@leica.gmbh
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 12:18 AM [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney
>
> We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and
> answer the questions.
>
> tc@leica.gmbh
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote:
>
>> [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh>
>> Leica Concealing quality issues before sales
>>
>> My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence :
>>
>> https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors
>>
>> why Leica Camera Delete the Promise?
>> Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients?
>>
>> Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, and
>> how you cheating the clients now.
>>
>> Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? here's
>> the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following:
>>
>> The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer:
>>
>>
>> 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have
>> problems within three years.
>>
>> 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not
>> know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than
>> 90% of the machines have problems?
>>
>> 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be
>> charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and
>> cheating?
>>
>> 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD quality.
>> Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, in order
>> to make a profit?
>>
>>
>>
>> www.leica.gmbh
>> <#m_2318941503277705028_m_-3194037728260264468_m_2086946676543469196_>
>> fraud@leica.gmbh
>>
>
Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and answer the questions. T.C On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 3:39 AM [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney > > We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and > answer the questions. > > tc@leica.gmbh > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 12:18 AM [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney >> >> We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and >> answer the questions. >> >> tc@leica.gmbh >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote: >> >>> [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh> >>> Leica Concealing quality issues before sales >>> >>> My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence : >>> >>> https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors >>> >>> why Leica Camera Delete the Promise? >>> Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients? >>> >>> Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise, >>> and how you cheating the clients now. >>> >>> Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9? >>> here's the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following: >>> >>> The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer: >>> >>> >>> 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have >>> problems within three years. >>> >>> 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not >>> know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than >>> 90% of the machines have problems? >>> >>> 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be >>> charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and >>> cheating? >>> >>> 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD >>> quality. Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years, >>> in order to make a profit? >>> >>> >>> >>> www.leica.gmbh >>> <#m_-5831679742336754283_m_2318941503277705028_m_-3194037728260264468_m_2086946676543469196_> >>> fraud@leica.gmbh >>> >>
Fehler bei der Nachrichtenzustellung an folgende Empfänger oder Gruppen:
Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com<mailto:Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com<mailto:Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com<mailto:Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Marita.Paasch (Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com)<mailto:Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com<mailto:Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Support@leica-camera.com<mailto:Support@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
dennis.steuer (dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com)<mailto:dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com>
Die eingegebene E-Mail-Adresse konnte nicht gefunden werden. Überprüfen Sie die E-Mail-Adresse des Empfängers, und versuchen Sie, die Nachricht erneut zu senden. Wenn das Problem weiterhin besteht, wenden Sie sich an Ihren E-Mail-Administrator.
Diagnoseinformationen für Administratoren:
Generierender Server: ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com
Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Support@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup'
Ursprüngliche Nachrichtenköpfe:
Received: from ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) by
ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.28; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:12:37 +0200
Received: from ldesmailproxy.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.53) by
ldesex01.lcg.leica-camera.com (172.29.40.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
15.1.2375.28 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:12:37 +0200
Received: from mailgateway.leica-camera.com (mailgateway.leica-camera.com [172.29.16.59])
by ldesmailproxy.lcg.leica-camera.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD9E20385;
Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:12:37 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mailgateway.leica-camera.com;
spf=pass (leica-camera.com: domain of teeseewoo@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=teeseewoo@gmail.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com;
dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
Received: from mail-yw1-f177.google.com (mail-yw1-f177.google.com [209.85.128.177])
by mailgateway.leica-camera.com with ESMTP id 26OHCJv8003560-26OHCJvA003560
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher�DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits%6 verify�FAIL);
Sun, 24 Jul 2022 19:12:20 +0200
Received: by mail-yw1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31e7055a61dso89268547b3.11;
Sun, 24 Jul 2022 10:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s 210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=LdFTtHx7cQK/urLsVaR6s1zAxB8S+myFReBbJM8akdo=;
b=Fmvwx4tfZZGg5bG6sqA2TtuoHlFtljJQY+9qG9OPJJOiIV5C2vXPHfmgih8RMPJd/3
BXGVxeTSIC4uqqwr8Igi/mcMdp1SHES4LUIn4Y7eQNsBxEqALaGok2+EBNE38lZlxaa7
HmYNPEm9AX8ygKHjEX74QI5GKG4aQRv8ggZe+SgPPuPA3a14pVEdoBQJ3zfeiL5vVm1b
gr6o4AVOh1HV3heL0WxylQVZiaQJl99H8cXIA5FnA7P/2dhV4/8vG0eSvrl20cbGr1+H
39uCqmsvXS4xEPd3m0IHeVO/8m2fAvD32fuwRl6GrnkVteOrVgRDfopdAjguuGJGECi/
j4dg=X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d 100.net; s 210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=LdFTtHx7cQK/urLsVaR6s1zAxB8S+myFReBbJM8akdo=;
b=VM8aaWM0cGri3fg1QvGL5B8N8qtSQoA9ZC0WSqCQ28ijrxP2T5+Xs5bEurid0mVRj2
ZtOkv1EvehXv7k9h1B2F4Q6u2kJz8v7YcJDu8XlugtsfqkOM3OdM39zUTsSbqBvMc4OC
i3qi/kfh9HB6bfsNSMsXlV8eLetFHFI4sUAT6Xb3gVCJPuc53c/U13ksI7d82RJPmhrv
4dt88DH3s61HUEPx5eHB+ClK6n+zV6ytx6tjDrYWsPXNh4nDFK62ob+5LPHny19YMq1l
zd9fWLW6kWLY4SCs3lwA/i933rafRts0AVCWkYXOh0MTCe389I9L8iVu54ALlpVdRZbm
Mc0A=X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+UGm9bKkKaCM94rAPBMaD9RHcmwAVO6+zkwH7kL7Hz/RN4gt0z
qtS5KAc9dYc9B80MZsiDl+P5yHOnB3L16c6Ztb0X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1u9IT+VgmNZHOPgJ37yIe9lL8cbdHmyNsaomhXf7RlzAQ8RsamzPU0NLk0PyEgZFAK5GOyuqDLxfCVv/WVn+/4X-Received: by 2002:a81:a1c3:0:b0:31e:6d87:43be with SMTP id
y186-20020a81a1c3000000b0031e6d8743bemr7285671ywg.412.1658682739269; Sun, 24
Jul 2022 10:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <tencent_A0C31C0F84738EE65EDF4CB7A6532D2DBE06@qq.com>
<CAK3OhgAfd9-XrRarvSif9aGyQucadKUyLHhH0i=4kf+Fz+P7zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OhgDjn08nox1LKDsS62qQW9Z+h+wHX_ShxHBgm95gDZ87dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OhgDjn08nox1LKDsS62qQW9Z+h+wHX_ShxHBgm95gDZ87dg@mail.gmail.com>
From: [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:11:38 +0800
Message-ID: <CAK3OhgA1Byut5Ywct33q_5Ag-qiB-hd4dr1XRJxPr8vzGi193g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Leica Cheating Clients again in 2022, let's look at Leica's M bad quality
To: =?UTF-8?B?6ZmG5Y2a5paH?= <22327861@qq.com>, "Coletta, Nadine"
<Nadine.Coletta@leica-camera.com>, "Brand-Gerheim, Ursula"
<Ursula.Brand-Gerheim@leica-camera.com>, <Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com>,
Marita.Paasch <Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com>,
<Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com>, <Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com>,
<Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com>, dennis.steuer
<dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com>, <Support@leica-camera.com>, sandra.looke
<sandra.looke@leica-camera.com>, Elke Macha <Customer.Care@leica-camera.com>,
"Brand, Ursula" <Ursula.Brand@leica-camera.com>, "Kupfer, Sven"
<Sven.Kupfer@leica-camera.com>, "Masney, Kirstin"
<Kirstin.Masney@leica-camera.com>, spareparts <spareparts@leica-camera.com>,
technicalinfo <technicalinfo@leicacamerausa.com>, info
<info@leicasportoptics.com>, <leica@nikecomm.com>, repair
<repair@leicacamerausa.com>, <info@leicastoredc.com>,
<andreas.schweiger@leitz-auction.com>, <info@leicagalleryboston.com>,
<info@lfi-online.de>, <holtorf@lfi-online.de>, <ribeiro@lfi-online.de>,
<lfi@aboteam.de>, <oskar-barnack-award@leica-camera.com>,
<support@picter.com>, <sinar@macconsult.de>, customercare.cn
<customercare.cn@leica-camera.com>, customercare.hk
<customercare.hk@leica-camera.com>, <customercare.tw@leica-camera.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078255a05e4902bf6"
X-FEAS-DKIM: Valid
X-FE-Policy-ID: 0:1:1:leica-camera.com
Return-Path: teeseewoo@gmail.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Andreas.Hecker@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Beate.Berns@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Fedja.Bobanovi@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Marita.Paasch@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
X-Display-Name: Marita.Paasch
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Mathias.Harsch@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Support@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;Support@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
Original-Recipient: rfc822;dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;dennis.steuer@leica-camera.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.10
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup
X-Display-Name: dennis.steuer
Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney
We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and answer
the questions.
T.C
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 3:39 AM [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney
>
> We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and
> answer the questions.
>
> tc@leica.gmbh
>
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 12:18 AM [Name] <teeseewoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear CEO@Leica.gmbh and Kirstin Masney
>>
>> We hope you and Leica Camera can stop cheating and face the fact and
>> answer the questions.
>>
>> tc@leica.gmbh
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:45 PM [Name] <22327861@qq.com> wrote:
>>
>>> [image: logo] <http://www.leica.gmbh>
>>> Leica Concealing quality issues before sales
>>>
>>> My name is [Name], Leica Camera Company Delete the Evidence :
>>>
>>> https://en.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2014/Important-Information-Concerning-the-CCD-Sensors
>>>
>>> why Leica Camera Delete the Promise?
>>> Is the CEO force the staffs to cheat clients?
>>>
>>> Please look at the following link or the attachment, how you promise,
>>> and how you cheating the clients now.
>>>
>>> Leica ever announces Permanent Fix for CCD Sensor Corrosion on M9?
>>> here's the evidences from media, and similar evidence still as following:
>>>
>>> The following is my question for you, I hope you can prove the answer:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Why, most of the CCDs of more than 90% of the Leica M machines have
>>> problems within three years.
>>>
>>> 2. Why do we buy, when we sell in the world in 2014, 2015, 2016, do not
>>> know in advance that the sensor will be prone to problems? And more than
>>> 90% of the machines have problems?
>>>
>>> 3. Why do you know that when you make a profit in sales, you will not be
>>> charged for the beginning of 2017? Is there any difference between this and
>>> cheating?
>>>
>>> 5. Leica is deliberately selling a camera with a problematic CCD
>>> quality. Can it be forced to pay for expensive repairs every three years,
>>> in order to make a profit?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> www.leica.gmbh
>>> <#m_-5831679742336754283_m_2318941503277705028_m_-3194037728260264468_m_2086946676543469196_>
>>> fraud@leica.gmbh
>>>
>>
Archival plaintext from the complainant’s Gmail export. Auto-replies and delivery-status notices are retained because they document the communication pattern. This page is an exhibit, not a court judgment.