LEICA.GMBHSATIRE
ENDE中文

Daily update · 2026-09-21

Promised reply not delivered

SC / Customer Care auto tickets and “we will get back to you” lines are not a numbered written answer to Q1–Q12. Where named staff or auto-replies promised a reply and then went silent, this archive records that as alleged cheat / deceive — not a court finding of fraud.

As of 2026-09-21 · ~4,312 days since Dec 2014 goodwill · ~2,572 days since Brand €1303 letter · still no point-by-point written reply from Leica Camera AG / Wetzlar · Message blocked ≠ reply.

This note does not invent new mailbox facts. It tightens the public demand already on the homepage: headquarters correspondence in this file includes promises of a reply or follow-up from named Customer Care / Complaint Management staff. What still has not arrived is a numbered, point-by-point written answer to the twelve questions.

Names already on the public record

  • Ursula Brand — Customer Care; €1303 + VAT class letter (6 Sep 2019) and related threads.
  • Kirstin Masney — Complaint Manager; CCD production-stop statement (Oct 2019) in this file.
  • Mail-thread names Coletta, Kaufmann, Seria — already indexed on /emails/.
  • Blocked-mail cluster (Message blocked): Brand / Kupfer / Frank / Steuer / Roder — see /blocked-correspondence/.

Why auto tickets are not an answer

Service-cloud / CRM ticket numbers and generic auto-replies acknowledge receipt. They do not answer Q1–Q12. Delivery failures titled Message blocked are also not a written reply. Treating either as closure would let silence pass for substance.

Frame used on this domain: headquarters staff and systems allegedly cheated / deceived this customer by promising a response that never became a substantive written explanation. That is an allegation for public pressure — not a court verdict of fraud.

Q1–Q12 · Email archive · Blocked correspondence · Same-day: Schmidt HK alleged lifetime CCD · Contradiction card

← All dated updates