This note does not invent new facts and does not claim a new letter was sent. It restates the geographic-return question already on this archive’s journal entry for 2019-11-11 and the open list on /questions/.
On 11 November 2019, the file records Coletta correspondence framed around customs and an alleged Europe-only return address, while the complainant had already cited the Hong Kong Consumer Council and previously discussed HK shipping (thread linked from that journal page). The same geographic tension sits beside the named regional distributor path on Schmidt Marketing (Hong Kong) and the HQ “not acknowledgeable” course noted on 2026-09-25.
Open line as of 2026-10-02: /questions/ still asks Why Europe-only return, not Hong Kong? Orders 1058152 / 1105973 stay on the payment-on-file record. Allegations and unanswered questions only — not a court finding.
Journal: Europe-only (2019-11-11) · 12 questions (Europe-only return) · Prior note: Schmidt HK · Prior note: not-acknowledgeable · Case 1058152 · 2014 / 2017 / 2018 / 2020 side-by-side