LEICA.GMBHSATIRE
ENDE中文

Daily update · 2026-11-02

Q2 still open: the official 2014 CCD notice behind HTTP 403 (alleged)

DE: Frage Q2 bleibt offen: der offizielle CCD-Hinweis-Pfad von 2014 liefert in den hier hinterlegten Aufnahmen HTTP 403 Forbidden. Keine neuen Tatsachen; Behauptung, keine Feststellung.

This note adds no new facts. It compiles, from pages already on this archive, the trail behind Q2: the official Leica-camera.com 2014 CCD goodwill notice path is recorded in this file’s 2019-09-11 journal and exhibits EX01–EX02 as returning HTTP 403 Forbidden, restated in the 2026-09-22 update and placed in the autumn-2019 case sequence. For the short word list see the glossary; for the sequence see the timeline.

1. What Q2 asks

On the twelve-questions page, Q2 asks where the official CCD notice lives after the path that once carried the 2014 goodwill wording began returning Forbidden. The September 2026 journal entry for Q2 frames a product-safety notice that disappears behind Forbidden as itself an exhibit. That question is still listed as open.

Q1–Q12 · Journal Q2 2026-09-15 · Q1/Q2/Q9 still open

2. The 2019-09-11 capture on file

The journal entry dated 2019-09-11 records the complainant’s screenshots of the Leica-camera.com notice path. Those stills are filed as exhibits EX01 and EX02. This archive treats that date as the on-file observation that the official notice URL returned HTTP 403 Forbidden — not as a court finding.

Journal 2019-09-11 · Exhibits EX01–EX02 · Public sources

3. The 2026-09-22 403 update

The dated note of 22 September 2026 restates the same trail without inventing new facts: the official notice path, in this file’s exhibits, is alleged to sit behind Forbidden while third-party reprints of the 2014 goodwill wording still circulate. That update is the dedicated 403 landing this archive already publishes.

2026-09-22 403 update · 2014 goodwill · Promises vs delivery

4. Autumn 2019: 403 in the case sequence

The 2026-10-24 autumn-2019 file places the 403 observation next to estimate 1058152, the “not acknowledgeable” purchase-proof reply, the Schmidt HK allegation and the Europe-only return — so a reader can see the 403 as one step in the same individual-case sequence, not a free-standing headline.

Autumn 2019 one file · Not acknowledgeable · Europe-only return

5. Measuring stick: 2014 goodwill wording

The promises page and the 2014 goodwill update keep the publicly reported Kulanz text — free CCD replacement regardless of camera age, covering the M9-family bodies named on this archive — as the measuring stick. The allegation compiled here is that owners seeking that original official notice met a Forbidden response on the company path cited in the exhibits.

Promises side-by-side · Goodwill 2014 · Four bodies 2014

6. Third-party reprints still circulate

While the official notice path is alleged to return 403 in this file’s captures, third-party reporting of the same 2014 goodwill era remains linked from the sources and journal pages (including LFI-era and DPReview-era material already on this archive). That contrast — reprints available, official path Forbidden — is exactly what Q2 keeps asking about.

Sources · LFI 2014-12-11 · Source map

7. Q12: will the notices be restored?

Question 12 on the same list asks whether the 2014–2020 notices will be restored in readable form. Together with Q2, it keeps the accessibility of the original goodwill and later stop wording on the open-questions board. No numbered point-by-point reply answering that pair is on file as of this date.

Q12 on questions page · How the answer changed · Auto-replies ≠ answers

8. What Q1 and Q9 still ask beside Q2

Q1 asks what the current written position is on the 2014 goodwill for affected CCD bodies; Q9 asks how quoted cost-sharing and later stop notices sit against “regardless of age” and against the June 2020 estimate. Reading Q2 next to Q1 and Q9 is the pattern already used in the 2026-10-21 update; this note does not reopen those questions with new facts.

Q1–Q12 · Q1/Q2/Q9 note · Reader FAQ

Open line as of 2026-11-02: no numbered point-by-point written reply to Q1–Q12 is on file. A company letter dated 2 October 2026 is on file; the consumer disputes its closure of the matter (2026-10-03 update). Allegations and unanswered questions only, not a court finding.

CCD-Korrosion (DE) · M9 CCD corrosion (EN) · Wetzlar Customer Care · Public sources · Exhibits · 12 questions

← All dated updates